Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 02:34

Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What do all Indian parents have in common?
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What will help me to get a bigger butt naturally?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Texas public health departments brace for another $119 million in federal cuts - The Texas Tribune
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
The Return: Now We Know When Shōta Imanaga is Coming Back! - Bleacher Nation
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.